[Moon-Net] EME QSL Etiquette question

Edward R Cole kl7uw at acsalaska.net
Tue Nov 22 18:57:07 CET 2016

David addresses this very well.

I have no security issues getting paper QSL's 
with money for postage (the usual is $2 that I 
receive from international hams; US hams usually 
send me a SASE).  Both are greatly appreciated as 
my QSL for KL7 on 2m is in high demand.

I QSL 100% initial eme contacts.  IRC require me 
to travel 80km to another Post Office to redeem 
and still involves 30-minutes while postal 
workers look up regulation, each time.  So please no IRC's.

I prefer direct QSL's but will use ARRL QSL 
Bureau (KL7HFQ) but expect at least 6-month delay 
in my receiving them (come in batches).  I'm 
currently behind about 12+ QSL's in replying.  I will get there (100%).

Some have had my QSL lost several times; I 
re-sent them.  Also some have their  QSL returned 
"undeliverable" which makes no sense as my 
QRZ.com address is fine but only use the PO Box 
as there is no home delivery (helps me stay in 
good relation with my local Post Office people 
who need the box number for sorting the mail).

I do not do LOTW or eQSL so do not ask for that.

Now at above 500 initials on 2m, 47 initials on 
23cm, and 8 initials on 6m.  My initial Logs are 
available on my webpage which show QSL status.

I worked 51 in the recent ARRL Contest which 
betters last year at 29.  Be nice to work 100 
some day, but I will be splitting operations with 
23cm.  I decided not to run 6m in the contest as 
QSO's are currently taking 1-1/2 hours to 
complete, often running several days in 
attempts.  9cm is in the works with possibly QRV 
in spring (outside work in winter is not nice).

73, Ed - KL7UW

At 03:36 AM 11/22/2016, David Anderson wrote:
>A few points.
>IRC are useless now, post offices don't issue 
>new ones and are reluctant to honour them, they 
>see so few they don't know what they are. Often 
>people send ones that are out of date and they 
>are really worthless. Green stamps don't expire.
>Some stations offer the ability to pay via 
>PayPal via OQRS where you can request a card 
>direct without sending one. You have the choice 
>of asking for a free card but it will be sent via the Buro and won't be quick.
>No point in sending email JPGs for QSL cards, 
>not valid for any award, as could be forged so easily.
>You are right, due to the number of contacts 
>now, it can be a real burden in time and money 
>to QSL for many DX stations. Postage rates are 
>much higher than they used to be.
>So QSL only if you are asked to by the other 
>station, or if you need a card for an award or new DXCC State locator etc.
>Always check <http://QRZ.COM>QRZ.COM for QSL 
>details of the DX station first, don't assume 
>they use the Buro, eQSL, LOTW or anything.
>Consider joining LOTW, you don't need to be an ARRL member.
>For regular non EME contacts I ask for return 
>postage in US $ or Euro and a SASE for direct 
>cards. Or the card goes via the Buro, but it 
>won't be quick. I accept OQRS payment for direct 
>card requests without a card being received.
>For EME only I am happy to QSL direct without 
>charge at present, I may review this if I become 
>very active. I don't send cards out unless 
>requested, or I especially need a QSL for some 
>reason. I use LOTW and eQSL, but actually wonder 
>why I use eQSL as it isn't valid for awards, but LOTW is.
>Once again, the most important thing is to find 
>out how the other fellow handles QSLing, and the 
>place is <http://QRZ.COM>QRZ.COM.
>David Anderson GM4JJJ
>On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 07:49, Bob Atkins 
><<mailto:ka1gt at hotmail.com>ka1gt at hotmail.com> wrote:
>It's been about 35 years since I was last active 
>on 432 EME. At that time there weren't a huge 
>number of stations on and it was all CW. QSOs 
>could take 30 minutes or more to complete, 
>Consequently sending and receiving QSL cards 
>directly wasn't much of an issue since not many were involved.
>What's the EME QSL etiquette today? Do people 
>generally QSL direct? It was always good 
>practice to include a SASE with a card, 
>including postage if the contact was with a US 
>station, or IRCs if international. However I 
>don't think you can buy IRCs from the US post office any more.
>I'm perfectly happy paying posting on any cards 
>I send when I get a card from another station, 
>but I guess that the cost of postage and number 
>of contacts possible today might be a financial burden on some stations.
>Is anyone using an electronic (email) QSL card 
>system, sending a printable JPEG file with all 
>the contact details filled in and signed by the 
>station operator? I print my own cards anyway, 
>so another station would get the same card 
>whether I print it or they print it, though mine 
>would have hand written text and a live signature.
>I'd like to exchange cards with a few EMEÂ 
>contacts made during the contest (and at other 
>times). Just wondering what's the general 
>practice (if such a ting exists)Â on EME these days.
>Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions 
>are at 
>Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions 
>are at http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html

73, Ed - KL7UW
     "Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag Business e-mail:
     dubususa at gmail.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.pe1itr.com/pipermail/moon-net/attachments/20161122/9787e8cb/attachment.html 

More information about the Moon-net mailing list