[Moon-Net] NO 73s for a "valid" contact!
peter at pa2v.com
Mon Nov 21 11:23:27 CET 2016
Conrad, and others,
IF 73’s are needed for a complete contact, most DX-pedition QSO’s are invalid, and quite some in the past with CW too.
Under difficult conditions, during piles and contest one don’t spoil time in the unnecessary 73’s.
I like to finish a contact with 73, but if it is clear to me that we have all details on both sides I count it as a valid QSO.
On HF with the many contests you will seldom hear a 73 in phone nor CW.
So simple is it!
73, Peter PA2V
(Still very happy with my E44CM 432MHz EME QSO)
Van: Conrad PA5Y [mailto:g0ruz at g0ruz.com]
Verzonden: maandag 21 november 2016 10:51
CC: Moon-Net <moon-net at mailman.pe1itr.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [Moon-Net] Are 73s needed for a "valid" contact?
Well actually the thread has been somewhat hijacked. The original poster asked if 73 was required for a complete QSO.
The emphatic answer is NO this is well documented and not really worthy of further debate.
I then gave a few examples of real world EME behaviour to help illustrate how things work along with a message to listen and observe and figure it out for oneself.
On the subject of the logger and its use in the contest if 73 is not required for a QSO then passing thankyou messages after a contact is logged is irrelevant.
The only competitive advantage that I gained by using the logger during the contest was for allowed frequency announcements and as an aid to staying awake!
I will take these issues up with the ARRL privately before submitting my logs. If I am disqualified for sending tnx wishes on the logger AFTER a qso is logged then so be it.
I did the contest to see what my station is capable of, I have answered that to my own satisfaction.
Final score 206 x 84 = 1730400
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Moon-net