[Moon-Net] SPIDs

Antonio Matias ct1ffu at gmail.com
Wed Nov 2 22:23:03 CET 2016


Lolololol.

Nice move  Lars

73

Em 02/11/2016 21:20, "Lars Pettersson" <sm4ive at telia.com> escreveu:

> Serge
>
> My 62 years old Brain decode CW despite my IQ :-) Who needs a  MAP  to
> find the way to a QSO    LOL
>
> 73 Lars SM4IVE
>
> Den 2016-11-02 kl. 21:08, skrev serge:
>
> Thank you Alex for correcting me. Yes the IQ+ does not decode but MAP65
> does. However for map65 to decode it requires signal from the IQ+ so it is
> really a play on words.
> What I should have said is the following  The combination of the IQ+ &
> MAP65 does not decode as well as my 40 year old ICOM 275A & WSJT 7.
> I will try to do what you suggested regarding more gain at the input of
> the IQ+.
> Thank you Alex always a pleasure to hear from you
> Serge VE1KG
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Alex Artieda <hb9dri at emeham.com>
> *To:* 'serge' <ve1kg at eastlink.ca> ; 'Peter Connors' <sronnocfp at gmail.com>
> ; moon-net at mailman.pe1itr.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2016 5:58 PM
> *Subject:* RE: [Moon-Net] SPIDs
>
> Hello Serge
>
>
>
> Many times I said "the IQ+ don't decode" is the software who decodes, if
> you are presenting just 20dB gain at the input of the IQ+ then you are not
> following the specifications, you must have at least 24dB, regarding WSJT,
> install WSJT10, I really don't understand why people insist WSJT7 decode
> better, Joe already said that many times.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> 73 de Alex, ZS6EME
>
>
>
> *From:* moon-net-bounces at mailman.pe1itr.com [mailto:moon-net-bounces@
> mailman.pe1itr.com <moon-net-bounces at mailman.pe1itr.com>] *On Behalf Of *
> serge
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 2. November 2016 15:19
> *To:* Peter Connors; moon-net at mailman.pe1itr.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Moon-Net] SPIDs
>
>
>
> Peter & all GA
>
> Just set up your rotor. Run to it good size shield wires. 80M is a long
> length. Just measure the voltage at the end of the line with the rotor
> hooked up & see if the voltage drops when you activate your rotor with a
> load & adjust voltage accordingly. I do not know what is the current is
> when rotor is activated but the controller should provide the required
> voltage & available current at the rotor. 240 feet of cable is long cable
> but it should work if a good size cable is used. There is I believe 4 wires
> 2 for power & 2 for data.
>
> GL Peter
>
> Serge VE1KG
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Peter Connors <sronnocfp at gmail.com>
>
> *To:* moon-net at mailman.pe1itr.com
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:57 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Moon-Net] SPIDs
>
>
>
> This is of  interest to me because I am in the process of assembling an
> eme station using the RAS with a ~80m cable run so I have searched the
> internet (and the Moon-net archives back to 2012 so far) for information.
> While there are significant differences in systems that experience
> problems/no problems there is no single definitive source of information on
> 'the right way to do it'.
>
> From what I have read, the difference in the outcome for different
> stations appears to be affected by whether the RAS is HR (which appears
> much less noise immune), the motor cable size/resistance, power supply
> regulation, psu sharing between the controller and the motors, the model of
> the controller, the sensor cable construction and its screening/earthing.
> The degree of mechanical imbalance/inertia in the array will also affect
> the startup currents and thus the voltage drop and/or noise spike in the
> system. Anything I have fogotten? Maybe the firmware...
>
> What one station will 'get away with' is not always replicated by another
> with different system values, and the lack of a full set of parameters can
> leave a Spid user in the dark. Meanwhile, the information search turns up
> all sorts of useful stuff - and its fun!
>
> Pete, G4PLZ
>
> On 02/11/2016 11:09, Bjorn wrote:
>
> Some areas of interest pops up at an "even timesppread basis", and has
> almost the same content every time. Maybe creating an archive type of wiki
> would be a good plan?
>
>
>
> But anyway, time for a repeat:
>
> I am running approx 19V to my RAS/RAK rotators. Good cabling (of course
> shielded) and good power/cabling in the PS-line, No zeroing of directions
> at powr faults and no problem starting both az/el at the same time. No lost
> pulses. Be aware that the motor can take up to 10A in the startup spike, so
> starting both at the same time = could be up to 20A, if voltage drops too
> much = lost pulses.
>
>
>
> 73 de SM7SJR, Bjorn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at
> http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html
>
>
> --
> I dont do ESP QSO`s i prefere to hear the station.
> CW is still King!!!!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at
> http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.pe1itr.com/pipermail/moon-net/attachments/20161102/302ac26b/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Moon-net mailing list