I asked that question.
While I knew the other station was sending RRR based on our previous exchanges, the pattern never was clearly identified with my eye-brain connection, nor decoded by the software until later. I was interested to know whether the decoded RRR message was required, or whether it would be productive to keep straining at the screen, as I had been doing.
I strongly endorse the superior sharpness of the spectrum display of WSJT-10 over WSJT-X for this purpose.
Thanks for the responses! I will stick with WSJT-10 for this reason.
73 Parker W5ADD
Hi all,
As it is holiday season, I did not mind to do some nightly EME activity on
23cm last two nights. Most enjoyable! I worked only one CW station (VE6TA,
tnx Grant) but 4 new inits on JT. Ik1FJI (excellent signal, we can try CW!),
W2HRO, W1PV and K5DN.
That motivates me to try again coming night, so I hope to meet some new ones
again and also old friends of course. And hopefully on CW, however I run on
one leg as one of my modules is still broken so 250 instead of 500W
If I dont meet you tonight, I take the opportunity here to wish a healthy
and prosperous 2018!
73, Dick PA2DW
Rig:
K3 and Kühne TR1296H (GPS locked), SSPA 250W, LNA 0,16 dB, 2.4m prime focus
dish, OK1DFC septumfeed with choke.
Our distributor USA/Canada and South America SSB Electronic USA..( www.ssbusa.com )
If you want high performance and spec EME 2m transverters..
HNY! Gabi
Check: www.ha1ya.hu
---
Ezt az e-mailt az Avast víruskereső szoftver átvizsgálta.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hello,
I'm building two Wilkinson combiners/splitters for coupling two 432 MHz 500
W SSPAs. I'm using coaxial cable contrstruction, but I should like to be
very sure about cutting the 70.7 Ohm branches, whose length has to be
50*sqrt(2)*VF. In my logic this length should be measured between the two
ends where the jacket is cutted and the shield is plied away from the
dielectric (after the cutting of the jacket Z us supposed to change...): is
it correct? My doubt arises from a manual of RF engineering where I saw a
picture in which the dimension line of the branch was drawn between the
ends of the central conductors...
I would like to avoid trials because I have not much quantity of 70.7 Ohm
coaxial cable. So I ask you all, hoping that somebody experienced this
construction.
Tnx es 73 de
Alberto, IZ2EWV
Hi EMEer
In the past few days, Darg's value is low but the path from Asia to other areas seems not to be good.
I am QRV yesterday, the day before yesterday and the day before 1200 Z to the 70 cm band, but I can not trace the signal of Europe.
However, I am in winter vacation now, Therefore I will QRV every day for a while.
Everyone in the world, please QSO by all means.
de JE2UFF Toshi PM94bu
HNY List!
I saw something during operation on 2M last night that made me re-think
my understanding of the practical use of JT65 for EME.
A station was having some difficulting completing a QSO and the other
station had been sending SH RRR for many cycles. WHen finally complete,
the station having the Rx issue indicated they knew the other was
sending RRR because he could see it, but never switched to 73 because
they never got an RRR Decode.
This puzzled me because my understanding of the use of the special
coding for the RO, RRR, and 73 Shorthands was designed so that they
would be easy to visually verify. My standard practice has been that
if I am able to "see" the RRR at the correct location, I will consider
it received and progress to 73 regardless of a missing software decode.
Am I operating outside the accepted bounds of standard practice by doing
this?
Happy New Year to all on the list.
Curt Nixon
KU8L EN82
Vizkey
Paul,
Glad you found the solution. As hams we long have used grounding to
control probably dating back to the old vacuum tube days of high
voltage CW keying where you grounded a grid bias. But the digital
ckt engineers (that probably do not have the ham experience) use
digital HI levels to activate ckts. I suspect that is what you found.
Most ham sw use either RTS or DTR lines from RS232 ports to key a
radio. My old HB digital interface ckts used a small NPN transistor
(eg 2N2222) to key the radio PTT line or key the CW KEY input. A HI
to the transistor pulled the radio control lines low.
Apparently the TS2000X was designed for direct RS232 interface.
73, Ed - KL7UW
At 05:45 AM 12/29/2017, Paul Andrews via Moon-net wrote:
>Hello EME'ers,
>
>I solved the WSJT-X (for Windows) to TS-2000X problem using a free
>software tool called "dxlabsuite-commander".
>
>Dxlabsuite for Windows told me that the TS2000X (sometimes) wants to
>see the RS-232 (CAT) RTS (Ready To Send) line pulled HIGH. I also
>updated the Prolific USB to RS232 chip driver to the latest version
>for Windows.
>
>So within the WSJT-X radio preferences tab, I set the CAT interface to
>9600 baud, 8 Bits, 1 Stop Bit, No Parity and RTS to High. Bingo!
>WSJT-X communicates with my TS2000X perfectly. The TS2000X has been
>in production for many years and there may be several firmware
>versions in circulation so using RTS High may not be a universal fix
>but it worked for me.
>
>Running WSJT-X under the latest version of Apple OSX is still a
>problem. The RTS High option does allow WSJT-X to communicate with
>the TS-2000X but WSJT-X refuses to shut down properly and requires a
>full laptop power down before the application can be restarted.
>WSJT-X for OSX is stable for me as long as RIG control is OFF. I
>will try to reinstall WSJT-X for OSX. There are a few special file
>access permission steps in the installation process.
>
>I completed 3 new initials last night on 23cm and will be QRV 23cm
>again tonight with a 3M dish / LP feed / 150W. My system sees ON0EME
>at -15 so RX is good. I need to move my 150W SSPA closer to the feed
>- my TX signal reports are not as strong.
>
>73 - Paul - W2HRO
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Paul Andrews <w2hro.fn20(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello EME'ers,
> >
> > I'm looking for someone who is successfully using WSJT-X v1.8 and the
> > Kenwood TS-2000X. My interest is TS-2000X freq control for doppler
> > compensation on 23cm.
> >
> > I have tried WSJT-X for OSX and WSJT-X for Win10. The USB to RS-232
> > (CAT) cable uses the Prolific chipset. I am seeing communications
> > instability that eventually causes WSJT-X to lock up and require a
> > full power down reboot.
> >
> > WSJT-X is bulletproof until I try to control the TS-2000X. I'm
> > using WSJT-X with the TS-590S and not seeing these problems.
> >
> > Help and / or suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > HNY - 73 - Paul - W2HRO
>_______________________________________________
>Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at
>http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html
73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
Dubus-NA Business mail:
dubususa(a)gmail.com
To all,
I have uploaded the 17 minutes video of our Swaziland DXpedition last
October.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPumwDezLzk>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPumwDezLzk
I hope you like it and more video's of past DXpeditions can be found on
QRZ.com : PA2CHR
With kind regards / 73's
Chris
PA2CHR WW - loc: JO32DB (75HA)
Chris Ploeger, Mokkinkdijk 1, 7255 LM HENGELO-Gld.
The Netherlands. T: +31 (0)575 - 463113
I: <http://www.pa2chr.nl/> www.pa2chr.nl / E: <mailto:post@pa2chr.nl>
post(a)pa2chr.nl
(HB9/PA2CHR - F/PA2CHR - EA6/PA2CHR - T98CHR - LX/PA2CHR - J45M
ZA/PA2CHR - 3A/PA2CHR - 4U1ITU - LA/PA2CHR - 4O3A - 9A/PA2CHR
T7/PA2CHR - T70A - IC8/PA2CHR - C37MS (2011) - HB0/PA2CHR - 4O/PA2CHR
Z38/PA2CHR - ZS/PA2CHR - Z21EME - IK0/PA2CHR - HV0A - TK/PA2CHR - E44CM)
Hello EME'ers,
I'm looking for someone who is successfully using WSJT-X v1.8 and the
Kenwood TS-2000X. My interest is TS-2000X freq control for doppler
compensation on 23cm.
I have tried WSJT-X for OSX and WSJT-X for Win10. The USB to RS-232
(CAT) cable uses the Prolific chipset. I am seeing communications
instability that eventually causes WSJT-X to lock up and require a
full power down reboot.
WSJT-X is bulletproof until I try to control the TS-2000X. I'm
using WSJT-X with the TS-590S and not seeing these problems.
Help and / or suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
HNY - 73 - Paul - W2HRO